Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: a defence of legally enforceable contracts

J. Kim Swales, H.V. McLachlan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Commercial surrogate-motherhood contracts should be legally enforceable, despite the vociferous and prevalent opposition to them. We shall, in particular, argue here that they do not involve the commodification of children, nor in other ways are they contrary to the interests of the children concerned. Our case is developed in response to criticisms of arguments we have made before in defense of commercial surrogate motherhood, particularly those criticisms made by Elizabeth Anderson, who is probably the most influential, eloquent, and forceful opponent of commercial surrogate motherhood or, as it is sometimes called, 'contract pregnancy.'
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-107
Number of pages16
JournalLaw and Contemporary Problems
Volume72
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • surrogacy
  • surrogate motherhood
  • commercial
  • legally enforceable contracts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: a defence of legally enforceable contracts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this