Abstract
In the context of debates on the performance of EU Cohesion policy, this paper considers how the EU has used control mechanisms to influence the use of Structural Funds by Member States. Using the principal-agent model, this paper examines empirically three case studies of conditionalities applied to the absorption of funding (decommitment rule), outcomes of interventions (performance reserve) and targeting of expenditure (earmarking) in EU programmes over the 2000-13 period. The findings reveal different levels of effectiveness of the three conditionalities, attributable to the differential scope for trade-offs during the regulatory negotiations, external pressure and principal self-interest. From a policy perspective, the paper discusses an effectiveness threshold for introducing controls, the tensions between multiple conditionalities, and the limitations of top-down control mechanisms in influencing agent behaviour.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Regional Studies |
Early online date | 5 Sep 2013 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- european structural funds
- EU cohesion policy
- conditionalities
- performance
Impacts
-
Impact of research on the implementation of EU Cohesion policy on the European Commission's legislative proposals for the reform of the policy
John Bachtler (Participant), Laura Polverari (Participant), Carlos Mendez (Participant), Martin Ferry (Participant), Irene McMaster (Participant) & Rona Michie (Participant)
Impact: Impact - for External Portal › Policy and legislation, Economic and commerce
File