Criticizing the critic: comments on Jahoda's (2012) critique of Discursive Social Psychology

Tony Anderson, Sally Wiggins

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


Jahoda (2012) criticizes discursive social psychology (DSP) on several different grounds; specifically, he argues that DSP has opaque methodological procedures, is of questionable scientific merit, involves over-interpretation of its data, and implicitly claims its findings to be universal rather than contextually specific. We challenge these criticisms by arguing that observational studies of the kind typical within DSP research have a perfectly valid place within a scientific social psychology, that the interpretations made by DSP researchers should be seen in the context of a temporally extended research process in which they are subject to criticism and potential replication, and that Jahoda is himself guilty of over-interpretation by inferring claims of universality when such an inference is not warranted by the data (i.e. the qualitative content of the sample of research papers considered by Jahoda).
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalJournal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
Early online date28 Jul 2013
Publication statusPublished - 2013


  • discursive psychology
  • science
  • reflexivity
  • universality

Cite this