Cyclic CO2 – H2O injection and residual trapping: implications for CO2 injection efficiency and storage security

K. Edlmann, S. Hinchliffe, N. Heinemann, G. Johnson, J. Ennis-King, C. I. McDermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)


To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 °C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Early online date24 Nov 2018
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019


  • CO2
  • CO2 storage
  • cyclic CO2 injection
  • injection cycles
  • residual trapping
  • supercritical CO2


Dive into the research topics of 'Cyclic CO<sub>2</sub> – H<sub>2</sub>O injection and residual trapping: implications for CO<sub>2</sub> injection efficiency and storage security'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this