Abstract
This paper analyzes the wealth and risk incentive effects of managerial options and
shareholdings on the hedging probability of UK listed Alternative Investment Market
(AIM) companies. We find that the wealth incentive effect provided by managerial
option holdings increases the hedging likelihood. On the contrary, the wealth
incentive effect provided by managerial shareholdings decreases the hedging
likelihood. Further tests show that the incentive effect provided by managerial
shareholdings is significantly different if managers are not substantial shareholders of the company. Managers with substantial ownership are significantly less risk averse. Thus, the size and ownership structure characteristics of AIM companies seem to result in similarities between managers‟ and owners‟ behavior.
shareholdings on the hedging probability of UK listed Alternative Investment Market
(AIM) companies. We find that the wealth incentive effect provided by managerial
option holdings increases the hedging likelihood. On the contrary, the wealth
incentive effect provided by managerial shareholdings decreases the hedging
likelihood. Further tests show that the incentive effect provided by managerial
shareholdings is significantly different if managers are not substantial shareholders of the company. Managers with substantial ownership are significantly less risk averse. Thus, the size and ownership structure characteristics of AIM companies seem to result in similarities between managers‟ and owners‟ behavior.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 50 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Event | EFMA 2010 - Aarhus, Denmark Duration: 1 Jan 2010 → … |
Conference
Conference | EFMA 2010 |
---|---|
City | Aarhus, Denmark |
Period | 1/01/10 → … |
Keywords
- risk
- ownership
- managerial portfolio
- alternative investment market companies