Putting the nation back into 'the international'

N. Davidson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    54 Citations (Scopus)


    Alex Callinicos and Justin Rosenberg have both drawn on the concept of uneven and combined development to resolve what they see as deficiencies in international relations theory: in the case of the former, the absence of a non-realist explanation for the persistence of the states system; in the case of the latter, the absence of a sociological dimension to geopolitics. However, Callinicos omits any consideration of the 'combined' aspect of uneven and combined development, while Rosenberg ascribes characteristics of transhistoricity and internationality to uneven and combined development which it does not possess. Against attempts to either restrict or over-extend use of the concept, I will argue that its theoretical usefulness depends on understanding the limits of its spatial and chronological reach. An alternative, if still partial, explanation for the continued existence of the states system will emphasize the continuing indispensability of nationalism as a means of both containing class conflict within capitalist states and mobilizing support for 'national capitals' engaged in geoeconomic and geopolitical competition.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)9-28
    Number of pages19
    JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2009


    • international relations
    • geoeconomic
    • geopolitical


    Dive into the research topics of 'Putting the nation back into 'the international''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this