TY - BOOK
T1 - Research Information Management in the United States
T2 - Part 1—Findings and Recommendations. Part 2—Case Studies
AU - Bryant, Rebecca
AU - Fransen, Jan
AU - de Castro, Pablo
AU - Helmstutler, Brenna
AU - Scherer, David
PY - 2021/11/10
Y1 - 2021/11/10
N2 - The Research Information Management in the United States two-part report series provides a first-of-its-kind documentation of RIM practices at US research universities that presents a thorough examination of RIM practices, goals, stakeholders, and system components.Research information management (RIM) is a rapidly growing area of investment in US research universities. While RIM practices are mature in Europe and other locales in support of nationalized reporting requirements, RIM practices at US research universities have taken a different—and characteristically decentralized—course. A complex environment characterized by multiple use cases, stakeholders, and systems has resulted. This report provides a landscape overview of the state of research information management in the United States, makes sense of the complexity, and offers recommendations targeted at University leaders and other institutional decision makers. Part 1—Findings and RecommendationsThis report provides much-needed context for institutional leaders to examine their own local practices by proposing:- A summary of six discrete RIM use cases - A RIM system framework - Recommendations for RIM stakeholdersPart 2—Case Studies This companion report offers an in-depth narrative of the RIM practices at five US research institutions:- Penn State University- Texas A&M University - Virginia Tech- UCLA- University of Miami
AB - The Research Information Management in the United States two-part report series provides a first-of-its-kind documentation of RIM practices at US research universities that presents a thorough examination of RIM practices, goals, stakeholders, and system components.Research information management (RIM) is a rapidly growing area of investment in US research universities. While RIM practices are mature in Europe and other locales in support of nationalized reporting requirements, RIM practices at US research universities have taken a different—and characteristically decentralized—course. A complex environment characterized by multiple use cases, stakeholders, and systems has resulted. This report provides a landscape overview of the state of research information management in the United States, makes sense of the complexity, and offers recommendations targeted at University leaders and other institutional decision makers. Part 1—Findings and RecommendationsThis report provides much-needed context for institutional leaders to examine their own local practices by proposing:- A summary of six discrete RIM use cases - A RIM system framework - Recommendations for RIM stakeholdersPart 2—Case Studies This companion report offers an in-depth narrative of the RIM practices at five US research institutions:- Penn State University- Texas A&M University - Virginia Tech- UCLA- University of Miami
KW - research information management
KW - current research information systems (CRIS)
KW - institutional system configuration
KW - institutional case studies
KW - United States
U2 - 10.25333/8hgy-s428
DO - 10.25333/8hgy-s428
M3 - Other report
SN - 9781556532245
BT - Research Information Management in the United States
CY - Dublin, OH.
ER -